November 2008

Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
            1
2 3 4 5 6 7 8
9 10 11 12 13 14 15
16 17 18 19 20 21 22
23 24 25 26 27 28 29
30            

The Fine Print


  • The Appellate Practitioner
    © 2007-2008
    by Kimberly A. Kralowec
    All rights reserved.

Blog powered by TypePad

Disclaimer


  • Nothing in this blog constitutes legal advice. If you need legal advice, consult an attorney in your jurisdiction. To read this blog's complete disclaimer, click here.

« "Making Your Case: The Art of Persuading Judges" | Main | Two tidbits for appeals in class action objector cases: Chavez v. Netflix, Inc. »

April 30, 2008

Preserving issues on appeal: Woods v. Union Pacific Railroad Co.

The Court of Appeal's opinion in Woods v. Union Pacific Railroad Co., ___ Cal.App.4th ___ (Apr. 15, 2008; pub. ord. Apr. 28, 2008), begins with this paragraph:

Plaintiff Raymond A. Woods appeals from a judgment entered following the grant of a directed verdict in favor of defendant Union Pacific Railroad Company. We affirm the judgment. Plaintiff also appeals from the order awarding defendant ordinary costs and expert fees and costs. Inasmuch as plaintiff has presented no arguments with respect to this order, we deem plaintiff’s appeal from the order to have been abandoned and affirm the order. (Tiernan v. Trustees of Cal. State University & Colleges (1982) 33 Cal.3d 211, 216, fn. 4; Reyes v. Kosha (1998) 65 Cal.App.4th 451, 466, fn. 6.)

Slip op. at 2. In other words, make sure your brief addresses all the orders encompassed by your notice of appeal.

TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/t/trackback/454579/28590308

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Preserving issues on appeal: Woods v. Union Pacific Railroad Co.:

Comments

Post a comment

If you have a TypeKey or TypePad account, please Sign In