| Sun | Mon | Tue | Wed | Thu | Fri | Sat |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 |
| 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 |
| 15 | 16 | 17 | 18 | 19 | 20 | 21 |
| 22 | 23 | 24 | 25 | 26 | 27 | 28 |
| 29 | 30 | 31 |
« Ninth Circuit certifies two questions to California Supreme Court in past 7 days | Main | "Making Your Case: The Art of Persuading Judges" »
For two very different takes on the Court of Appeal's order modifying its opinion in Buell-Wilson v. Ford Motor Co., ___ Cal.App.4th ___ (Mar. 10, 2008; mod. Apr. 10, 2008), a punitive damages case, compare this post from the California Appellate Report with this post and this post from California Punitive Damages.
TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d8345172b069e200e551edea3b8833
Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Be careful what you wish for when seeking rehearing: Buell-Wilson v. Ford Motor Co.:
This is only a preview. Your comment has not yet been posted.
As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.
Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.
Comments